Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ulysses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(how about this?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It would seem more proper to title the article "Odysseus," and redirect Ulysses there. That was the original Greek name; "Ulysses" is the Latin equivalent.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 01:00, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | It would seem more proper to title the article "Odysseus," and redirect Ulysses there. That was the original Greek name; "Ulysses" is the Latin equivalent.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 01:00, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:There's already an article at Odysseus, although the article that Arcturus created seems to be better quality. Perhaps merge his content over there, changing the name as appropriate, and retain the template that's already there? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | :There's already an article at Odysseus, although the article that Arcturus created seems to be better quality. Perhaps merge his content over there, changing the name as appropriate, and retain the template that's already there? [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Makes sense. I'll merge (or rather, replace), then this page can be redirected there.--[[User:TomMoore|TomMoore]] 01:02, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:02, April 10, 2008
It would seem more proper to title the article "Odysseus," and redirect Ulysses there. That was the original Greek name; "Ulysses" is the Latin equivalent.--TomMoore 01:00, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
- There's already an article at Odysseus, although the article that Arcturus created seems to be better quality. Perhaps merge his content over there, changing the name as appropriate, and retain the template that's already there? DanH 01:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
- Makes sense. I'll merge (or rather, replace), then this page can be redirected there.--TomMoore 01:02, 10 April 2008 (EDT)