Difference between revisions of "Talk:Feminist style"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Title == Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title. ~~~~)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title.
 
Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title.
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Sexual harassment ==
 +
 +
Please, please, please tell me that the "think sexual harassment is a bad thing" is a vandal strike, or something.  Are you telling me there's people out there who believe sexual harassment is a good thing?  And that feminists are the only ones who believe it's bad?[[User:Raggs|Raggs]] 07:12, 15 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:12, April 15, 2008

Title

Depsite the fact this article is pathetic (I'm no fan of feminists but really..)I think it Feminist Style sounds awkward. Perhaps 'Characteristics' is a better title. AdenJ 01:46, 15 April 2008 (EDT)

Sexual harassment

Please, please, please tell me that the "think sexual harassment is a bad thing" is a vandal strike, or something. Are you telling me there's people out there who believe sexual harassment is a good thing? And that feminists are the only ones who believe it's bad?Raggs 07:12, 15 April 2008 (EDT)