Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:General disclaimer"
AliceMiller (talk | contribs) (Is this encyclopedia trustworthy or not?) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I suggest that be inserted on this page. It could even be added to the bottom of every page. | :I suggest that be inserted on this page. It could even be added to the bottom of every page. | ||
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 08:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | :[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 08:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I can't fail to notice the words '''The Trustworthy Encyclopedia''' at the top left of this page. | ||
| + | The [[Conservapedia:Disclaimer|disclaimer]] then informs us that "''Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable.''" Letting it be known that "'''''USERS RELY ON INFORMATION HERE ENTIRELY AT THEIR OWN RISK'''''". We are then informed that "''Conservapedia ... cannot guarantee the validity of any information found here...''" which begs the question: is this encyclopedia trustworthy or not? [[User:AliceMiller|AliceMiller]] 18:28, 16 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:28, April 16, 2008
No Disclaimer?
I don't get it. If this site is, and I quote, "one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind", why does it have that "not-complete" feel to it. I thought it was just the articles at first... but this is a project page for heaven's sake!
I shall be back. O2mcgovem 19:21, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
- At the bottom of each page there is a link to Disclaimers. It links here to an empty page.
- At Conservapedia:Disclaimer one can find a discalimer. It includes the sentence:
- Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable.
- I suggest that be inserted on this page. It could even be added to the bottom of every page.
- WhatIsG0ing0n 08:04, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
I can't fail to notice the words The Trustworthy Encyclopedia at the top left of this page. The disclaimer then informs us that "Nothing here has necessarily been reviewed or checked by anyone with expertise to ensure that it is accurate or reliable." Letting it be known that "USERS RELY ON INFORMATION HERE ENTIRELY AT THEIR OWN RISK". We are then informed that "Conservapedia ... cannot guarantee the validity of any information found here..." which begs the question: is this encyclopedia trustworthy or not? AliceMiller 18:28, 16 April 2008 (EDT)