Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolutionism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Code tags)
('Weak Atheism')
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
I've been wondering for a long time, is there any particular reason this artice uses <nowiki><code></nowiki> tags to produce monospaced text?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:10, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
 
I've been wondering for a long time, is there any particular reason this artice uses <nowiki><code></nowiki> tags to produce monospaced text?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:10, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== 'Weak Atheism' ==
 +
 +
Philip, you are obviously not familiar with 'Weak Atheism'.  Unlike 'Strong Atheism', which makes a positive statement about the non-existence of God, regardless of the evidence, this states that there is probably no God as there is no objective proof of God.  The 'world view' is dependant on the evidence, or lack of evidence, as is the science, so I fail to see how, in this case, the 'science is based on the world view', as you altered it to say.  You appear to believe that the only difference between 'Strong Atheism' and 'Weak Atheism' is the strength of the assertion that there is no God, whether this fits in with the evidence or not.  This is not the case. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 11:58, 18 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:58, April 18, 2008

Talk:Evolutionism/Archive 1

Code tags

I've been wondering for a long time, is there any particular reason this artice uses <code> tags to produce monospaced text? Philip J. Rayment 02:10, 31 October 2007 (EDT)

'Weak Atheism'

Philip, you are obviously not familiar with 'Weak Atheism'. Unlike 'Strong Atheism', which makes a positive statement about the non-existence of God, regardless of the evidence, this states that there is probably no God as there is no objective proof of God. The 'world view' is dependant on the evidence, or lack of evidence, as is the science, so I fail to see how, in this case, the 'science is based on the world view', as you altered it to say. You appear to believe that the only difference between 'Strong Atheism' and 'Weak Atheism' is the strength of the assertion that there is no God, whether this fits in with the evidence or not. This is not the case. Urushnor 11:58, 18 April 2008 (EDT)