Difference between revisions of "Genius bias"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by WeepingAngel (Talk); changed back to last version by GregLarson)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
<P>
 
−
''The Angels weep, piercing high heaven as though,''
 
−
</P>
 
−
<P>
 
−
''It were to cease in the morn, and the light of Phobeus,''
 
−
</P> 
 
−
<P>
 
−
''to be nought, for decay has withered the blooms, ''
 
−
  </P>
 
−
<p>
 
−
''devoured the unborn, wrapped all in veils of shadow,''
 
−
</P>
 
−
<P>
 
−
''woven by those who kill the goats, slay the lambs,''
 
−
</P>
 
−
<P>
 
−
'' Rachel weeping for her sons driven away, struck by Odins''
 
−
</P>
 
−
<P>
 
−
''wrath as death creeps like a sheep among the unborn.''
 
−
</P>
 
−
<P>
 
 
'''Genius bias''' is the tendency for people with a particularly belief system, especially [[liberals]], to promote someone with similar beliefs as a "genius" at the expense of more accomplished or qualified persons not sharing those beliefs.
 
'''Genius bias''' is the tendency for people with a particularly belief system, especially [[liberals]], to promote someone with similar beliefs as a "genius" at the expense of more accomplished or qualified persons not sharing those beliefs.
  

Revision as of 18:57, April 22, 2008

Genius bias is the tendency for people with a particularly belief system, especially liberals, to promote someone with similar beliefs as a "genius" at the expense of more accomplished or qualified persons not sharing those beliefs.

The New York Times often employs genius bias to promote an atheist or liberal. Although Jonathan Wells is more qualified than Richard Dawkins, the New York Times described Dawkins as an "eminent scientist" and an "evolutionary biologist".[1]

References