Difference between revisions of "Talk:The God Delusion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Ben Stein asked him how likely)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
: Isn't that essentially trying to "disprove" God?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:32, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
 
: Isn't that essentially trying to "disprove" God?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 11:32, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::No, not the same thing. Good point, AtheistJohn. Dawkins is very careful to say that he offers no proof that god does not exist. He only says that the existence of a god or gods is extremely unlikely. I hesitate to change the opening sentence of the article (I suspect it would be instantly reverted!), but I propose "The God Delusion is a book by the atheist Richard Dawkins, in which he attempts to prove that the existence of God is extremely unlikely." [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 13:05, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
 
::No, not the same thing. Good point, AtheistJohn. Dawkins is very careful to say that he offers no proof that god does not exist. He only says that the existence of a god or gods is extremely unlikely. I hesitate to change the opening sentence of the article (I suspect it would be instantly reverted!), but I propose "The God Delusion is a book by the atheist Richard Dawkins, in which he attempts to prove that the existence of God is extremely unlikely." [[User:Humblpi|Humblpi]] 13:05, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::In "[[Expelled]]" he hedges his bets, estimated the likelihood of no God between 50% and around 98%. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:09, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:09, April 23, 2008

Disprove God?

I don't think the headline is correct. He does not try to "disprove" God, he discusses why a supernatural creator almost certainly does not exist. He never contends that he is disproving God. --AtheistJohn 09:33, 23 April 2008 (EDT)

Isn't that essentially trying to "disprove" God? Philip J. Rayment 11:32, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
No, not the same thing. Good point, AtheistJohn. Dawkins is very careful to say that he offers no proof that god does not exist. He only says that the existence of a god or gods is extremely unlikely. I hesitate to change the opening sentence of the article (I suspect it would be instantly reverted!), but I propose "The God Delusion is a book by the atheist Richard Dawkins, in which he attempts to prove that the existence of God is extremely unlikely." Humblpi 13:05, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
In "Expelled" he hedges his bets, estimated the likelihood of no God between 50% and around 98%. --Ed Poor Talk 13:09, 23 April 2008 (EDT)