444
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 154:
Line 154: +
→'Weak Atheism': Urushnor is correct.
::::::::Well, if you're considering possible explanations before looking at the evidence you are NOT proposing solutions based on evidence. You are proposing solutions based on imagination. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 08:58, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
::::::::Well, if you're considering possible explanations before looking at the evidence you are NOT proposing solutions based on evidence. You are proposing solutions based on imagination. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 08:58, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::Having read this whole fascinating correspondence I have to say that Urushnor is correct. The point "Weak Atheism" makes is that there is no evidence that God exists. It goes on to suggest that - given this - we have no obligation, need, or reason to to believe in Him.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 16:11, 26 April 2008 (EDT)