Difference between revisions of "Talk:Edward R. Murrow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Info: He was a human being flawed like the rest of us.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:This would not equate to McCarthy being a Communist. Communism is a specific economic/social belief structure. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:08, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | :This would not equate to McCarthy being a Communist. Communism is a specific economic/social belief structure. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 02:08, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Though Senator M<sup>c</sup>Carthy's methods were often deplored by others, his reasons for engaging in his actions were to be a benefit to the United States. He '''did''' help uncover a vast network of people whose loyalties were suspect (at best). History has borne out that the fruit of his labor was a safer America. | ||
| + | :Was he a demogouge? Most certainly. But to throw out his entire effort because his methods were somewhat distasteful misses the point. [[User:MargeryCampbell|MargeryCampbell]] 02:16, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:16, April 28, 2008
Still needs...
I just added a great deal of info on this topic. Still need to add more biographical info. Scorpio 14:29, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
Info
Senator McCarthy was a communist in a few ways. He was not pro-American because he tried to censor the minds of people that were in America by taking down anyone with no proof, whatsoever. Ferthermore, he was not under attack because nobody would ever dare to attack Senator McCarthy for fear of being brought down themselves. He used fear and broke what is stated in the constitution (there was no proof needed to convict a person of being a communist, which you could be sent to jail for, and also lose what was basically your life) because of what he said. How is that pro-American? --Rocky
- This would not equate to McCarthy being a Communist. Communism is a specific economic/social belief structure. DanH 02:08, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- Though Senator McCarthy's methods were often deplored by others, his reasons for engaging in his actions were to be a benefit to the United States. He did help uncover a vast network of people whose loyalties were suspect (at best). History has borne out that the fruit of his labor was a safer America.
- Was he a demogouge? Most certainly. But to throw out his entire effort because his methods were somewhat distasteful misses the point. MargeryCampbell 02:16, 28 April 2008 (EDT)