Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sam Brownback"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(HarryPalms)
m (Formatting)
Line 1: Line 1:
I suspect that [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=HarryPalms HarryPalms] is a vandal.  The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms".  Disgusting.  Here's what he inserted into this article:
+
== HarryPalms ==
  
He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator]
+
I suspect that [[User:HarryPalms|HarryPalms]] [[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=HarryPalms contribs]] is a vandal.  The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms".  Disgusting.  Here's what he inserted into this article:
  
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source.  Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote.  This assertion isn't even cited in the article.  Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion.  This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative.  --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
+
::He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9178374/gods_senator]
 +
 
 +
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source.  Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote.  This assertion isn't even cited in the article.  Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion.  This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative.  -- [[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:30, March 17, 2007

HarryPalms

I suspect that HarryPalms [contribs] is a vandal. The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms". Disgusting. Here's what he inserted into this article:

He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[1]

I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- Bob Arctor 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)