Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
34 bytes removed ,  16:37, April 29, 2008
Line 58: Line 58:  
Shortly after the Voyager 2 flyby, [[Astronomy|astronomers]] proposed that Miranda was shattered five times by collisions and then reassembled by mutual gravitational attraction.<ref name=Chaikin/><ref name=Arnett/><ref name=planetsoc/><ref name=nasa1/> But such a small moon would not be likely to survive even one collision, much less five. This theory is now out of favor.
 
Shortly after the Voyager 2 flyby, [[Astronomy|astronomers]] proposed that Miranda was shattered five times by collisions and then reassembled by mutual gravitational attraction.<ref name=Chaikin/><ref name=Arnett/><ref name=planetsoc/><ref name=nasa1/> But such a small moon would not be likely to survive even one collision, much less five. This theory is now out of favor.
   −
The current favored theory is that Miranda was once in a 1:3 orbital resonance with [[Umbriel]], and then escaped that resonance. While Miranda was resonating with Umbriel, its orbit gained in eccentricity and thus subjected it to [[tidal heating]]. To support that theory, astronomers point out that Miranda's orbit, inclined 4.22° from Uranus' equator, is more severely inclined than that of any other satellite in the Uranian system.<ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites II. An explanation of the anomalously high orbital inclination of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 78(1):63-89, March 1989. Accessed April 28, 2008. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90070-5></ref><ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities." ''Icarus'' 85(2):394-443, June 1990. Accessed April 28, 2003. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-S></ref><ref>Malhotra, Renu, and Dermott, Stanley F. "The role of secondary resonances in the orbital history of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 85(2):444-480, June 1990. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90126-T></ref>
+
The current favored theory is that Miranda was once in a 1:3 orbital resonance with [[Umbriel]], and then escaped that resonance. While Miranda was resonating with Umbriel, its orbit gained in eccentricity and thus subjected it to [[tidal heating]]. To support that theory, astronomers point out that Miranda's orbit, inclined 4.22° from Uranus' equator, is more severely inclined than that of any other satellite in the Uranian system.<ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites II. An explanation of the anomalously high orbital inclination of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 78(1):63-89, March 1989. Accessed April 28, 2008. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(89)90070-5></ref><ref>Tittemore, William C., and Wisdom, Jack. "Tidal evolution of the Uranian satellites III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities." ''Icarus'' 85(2):394-443, June 1990. Accessed April 28, 2003. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90125-S></ref><ref>Malhotra, Renu, and Dermott, Stanley F. "The role of secondary resonances in the orbital history of Miranda." ''Icarus'' 85(2):444-480, June 1990. <doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90126-T></ref> Some believe that this tidal heating caused an upwelling of subsurface ice that produced some of the most pronounced surface features.<ref>Pappalardo, R. T., S. J. Reynolds, and R. Greeley (1997), [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE00802.shtml Extensional tilt blocks on Miranda: Evidence for an upwelling origin of Arden Corona], ''J. Geophys. Res''., 102(E6), 13,369–13,379.</ref>
 +
 
    
But this begs the question of how orbital resonances form, or how a satellite, once in such a resonance, would escape it. More to the point, however, is that the orbit of Miranda is not the most strikingly eccentric orbit in the Uranian system. Even among the major moons, that distinction belongs to Umbriel, not Miranda.
 
But this begs the question of how orbital resonances form, or how a satellite, once in such a resonance, would escape it. More to the point, however, is that the orbit of Miranda is not the most strikingly eccentric orbit in the Uranian system. Even among the major moons, that distinction belongs to Umbriel, not Miranda.
−
  −
Still other geologists insist that upwelling of subsurface ice can explain all of Miranda's features without the need to invoke cataclysmic shattering and re-formation.<ref>Pappalardo, R. T., S. J. Reynolds, and R. Greeley (1997), [http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/1997/97JE00802.shtml Extensional tilt blocks on Miranda: Evidence for an upwelling origin of Arden Corona], ''J. Geophys. Res''., 102(E6), 13,369–13,379.</ref>
      
== References ==
 
== References ==
12,071

edits

Navigation menu