Difference between revisions of "Talk:Unificationism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by RobbieFowler (Talk); changed back to last version by Ed Poor) |
(I still await your explanation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It's fairly obvious that adding information to an encyclopedia article is not the same as a "coordinated attack". Explain the changes? Bit difficult for them to do that as you blocked them both immediately. That instablocking on your part, without asking for explanations of edits, was more of a "coordinated attack", hmm? [[User:RobbieFowler|RobbieFowler]] 11:45, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Only correct information is allowed. Your first article contained an opinion which was contrary to facts. Not an auspicious start. What is your [[writing plan]]? How do you intend to contribute to this project? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:39, 1 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:39, May 1, 2008
It's fairly obvious that a coordinated attack is not the same as "providing legitimate information". If the two gentlemen I block have reason to give credence to the sources supplied, I wonder why they felt it more important to repeat their changes than to explain them. --Ed Poor Talk 11:31, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
- It's fairly obvious that adding information to an encyclopedia article is not the same as a "coordinated attack". Explain the changes? Bit difficult for them to do that as you blocked them both immediately. That instablocking on your part, without asking for explanations of edits, was more of a "coordinated attack", hmm? RobbieFowler 11:45, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
- Only correct information is allowed. Your first article contained an opinion which was contrary to facts. Not an auspicious start. What is your writing plan? How do you intend to contribute to this project? --Ed Poor Talk 09:39, 1 May 2008 (EDT)