Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ruhr"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (New page: The role of the river is perfectly clearly stated in para 2. ~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The role of the river is perfectly clearly stated in para 2. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:18, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 
The role of the river is perfectly clearly stated in para 2. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:18, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Yes, however the region you are referring to is named so BECAUSE of the river, which was there first.  The first term the reader should have definied for them in the article is that it is a river.  [[User:EngelUmpocker|EngelUmpocker]] 11:20, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 15:20, May 2, 2008

The role of the river is perfectly clearly stated in para 2. Bugler 11:18, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

Yes, however the region you are referring to is named so BECAUSE of the river, which was there first. The first term the reader should have definied for them in the article is that it is a river. EngelUmpocker 11:20, 2 May 2008 (EDT)