Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nelson Mandela"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Mandela and Bush)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
Such rediculous comparisons are hardly benignant or applicable Jacobin. The ANC (speaking specifically in regards to Umkhonto we Sizwe, of which Mandela was head) was under all prexisting contexts a terrorist organization, and cocurrently, there ''was'' a reason Mandela was in prison in the first place. Killing Civilians, especially women and children to reach your goals is hardly an admirable nor honorable action of which you so hastily ignore under the pretext of persuing racial freedom.  
 
Such rediculous comparisons are hardly benignant or applicable Jacobin. The ANC (speaking specifically in regards to Umkhonto we Sizwe, of which Mandela was head) was under all prexisting contexts a terrorist organization, and cocurrently, there ''was'' a reason Mandela was in prison in the first place. Killing Civilians, especially women and children to reach your goals is hardly an admirable nor honorable action of which you so hastily ignore under the pretext of persuing racial freedom.  
 
[[User:Willink|Willink]] 17:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 
[[User:Willink|Willink]] 17:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
There is no mention of the Mandela's criticisms of Bush: a point that the liberal Wikipedia is not remiss in making.  Conservatives would want to know what this man stands for. [[User:Jasonc65|Jason]] 10:33, 03 May 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:32, May 3, 2008

Oh, a head of state. Wasn't he a terrorist, too? --Wing Nut 14:38, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

Quite right. The liberals are trying to cover that up.
4. We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then the label "terrorist" is used here but not on Wikipedia. (See Differences_with_Wikipedia)
BillyBoy 14:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)


If your definition of "terrorist" is elastic enough to include Mandela and the struggle for racial freedom in South Africa, it's elastic enough to include George Washington and the American Revolution. There are times when violence is the only available recourse in the pursuit of freedom. Apartheid - like "taxation without representation" was one of those times. Jacobin 17:51, 14 April 2007 (EDT)

Such rediculous comparisons are hardly benignant or applicable Jacobin. The ANC (speaking specifically in regards to Umkhonto we Sizwe, of which Mandela was head) was under all prexisting contexts a terrorist organization, and cocurrently, there was a reason Mandela was in prison in the first place. Killing Civilians, especially women and children to reach your goals is hardly an admirable nor honorable action of which you so hastily ignore under the pretext of persuing racial freedom. Willink 17:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

There is no mention of the Mandela's criticisms of Bush: a point that the liberal Wikipedia is not remiss in making. Conservatives would want to know what this man stands for. Jason 10:33, 03 May 2007 (EDT)