Difference between revisions of "Talk:Violent video games"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (m)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Then the paretns are to blame, not video games. They're responsible. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 02:15, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
 
Then the paretns are to blame, not video games. They're responsible. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 02:15, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
  
And I've never been desensitized to indulge in violent act. This seems like a straw man argument. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 02:17, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
+
And I've never been desensitized to indulge in violent acts. This seems like a straw man argument. [[User:Ultimahero|Ultimahero]] 02:17, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:18, May 4, 2008

Wait. How do violent video games teach children to "engage in horrific virtual violence" when violent games aren't intended for children? Most are M rated games and, at least here in California, minors can't even buy them. Ultimahero 02:08, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

Because parents don't have the patience to check the ratings on what they buy their children. Or, even better, explain to them the differences between fact and fiction, allowing them to seperate the lovely gore of Grand Theft Auto from real life. IndianaJ 02:12, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

Then the paretns are to blame, not video games. They're responsible. Ultimahero 02:15, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

And I've never been desensitized to indulge in violent acts. This seems like a straw man argument. Ultimahero 02:17, 4 May 2008 (EDT)