Difference between revisions of "Talk:Natural law theory"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Any sane person, that has never experienced orgasm perhaps. Sorry, but if you are convinced it's solely for reproduction, then why do both men and women experience orgasm, a great sense o...) |
(answer to question) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sex is enjoyable, why would god have made it so enjoyable if it wasn't to be enjoyed?[[User:Raggs|Raggs]] 12:59, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | Sex is enjoyable, why would god have made it so enjoyable if it wasn't to be enjoyed?[[User:Raggs|Raggs]] 12:59, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Since the encyclical ''Casti Connubii'' in 1930, the Catholic Church has recognized "the cultivating of mutual love" as one of the secondary purposes of intimate marital relations. [[User:DavidE|DavidE]] 09:47, 5 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:47, May 5, 2008
Any sane person, that has never experienced orgasm perhaps. Sorry, but if you are convinced it's solely for reproduction, then why do both men and women experience orgasm, a great sense of pleasure in performing intercourse. Humans are so far thought to be one of only three species where both members of the sex enjoy it, and the other two are also highly intelligent animals.
Sex is enjoyable, why would god have made it so enjoyable if it wasn't to be enjoyed?Raggs 12:59, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- Since the encyclical Casti Connubii in 1930, the Catholic Church has recognized "the cultivating of mutual love" as one of the secondary purposes of intimate marital relations. DavidE 09:47, 5 May 2008 (EDT)