Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vandalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Bob Arctor (talk | contribs) (vandalism vandalized!) |
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It seems my new entry on vandalism was immediately vandalized. LOL. --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 00:12, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | It seems my new entry on vandalism was immediately vandalized. LOL. --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 00:12, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I left a message on your talk page to explain, but I will put it here. The material copied from wikipedia is a copy right violation because of the license used at this site. In addition meta-commentary is NOT appropriate in an article, save that for talk pages or pages specifically about conservapedia. Also unsourced questionable content is not desired. Please source your material. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 00:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:14, March 18, 2007
It seems my new entry on vandalism was immediately vandalized. LOL. --Bob Arctor 00:12, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- I left a message on your talk page to explain, but I will put it here. The material copied from wikipedia is a copy right violation because of the license used at this site. In addition meta-commentary is NOT appropriate in an article, save that for talk pages or pages specifically about conservapedia. Also unsourced questionable content is not desired. Please source your material. Tmtoulouse 00:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)