| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | | color=Yellow | | | color=Yellow |
| | | albedo=0.63<ref name=ssdphys/> | | | albedo=0.63<ref name=ssdphys/> |
| | + | | mfd=0.013 G<ref name=Kevelson>M. G. Kivelson, K. K. Khurana, R. J. Walker, C. T. Russell, |
| | + | J. A. Linker, D. J. Southwood, C. Polanskey. "[http://www.igpp.ucla.edu/galileo/doc/sci273/text.htm A Magnetic Signature at Io: Initial Report from the Galileo Magnetometer]." Galileo Magnetometer Team Site, October 27, 2000. Accessed May 12, 2008.</ref> |
| | + | | pmdm=7.86 * 10<sup>19</sup> N-m/T<ref name=calc/><ref name=Kevelson/> |
| | + | | cmdm=2.10 * 10<sup>22</sup> N-m/T<ref name=calc/> |
| | + | | mdt=1098.14 a<ref name=calc/> |
| | + | | mhl=761.17 a<ref name=calc/> |
| | }}'''Io''' is the innermost of the [[Galilean moons]] of [[Jupiter]]. It is the most [[volcano| volcanically]] active object in the [[solar system]] and the most dense of all [[planet]]ary satellites. Io was named for an Argive princess and priestess of [[Hera]] who became a fairly prominent mistress of [[Zeus]], after much suffering. That name, assigned quite by accident in the seventeenth century, might be quite apt today in view of Io's volcanic activity and the likely reason for it. | | }}'''Io''' is the innermost of the [[Galilean moons]] of [[Jupiter]]. It is the most [[volcano| volcanically]] active object in the [[solar system]] and the most dense of all [[planet]]ary satellites. Io was named for an Argive princess and priestess of [[Hera]] who became a fairly prominent mistress of [[Zeus]], after much suffering. That name, assigned quite by accident in the seventeenth century, might be quite apt today in view of Io's volcanic activity and the likely reason for it. |
| | | | |
| Line 53: |
Line 59: |
| | === Interior === | | === Interior === |
| | Io is more dense even than Earth's Moon and in fact is more dense than any other satellite of Jupiter (or any other planet).<ref name=ssdphys/> For that reason, and taking into account mass-concentration and other findings from flybys of all the Galilean satellites, Io is ''not'' suspected of having an underground saltwater ocean. Instead, it likely has a metal core of [[iron]] and/or [[iron sulfide]]. According to the best model available so far, the radius of this core likely extends to half the total radius of Io itself. Surrounding this would be a partially molten silicate-rich mantle with a thin rocky surface crust.<ref name=solarviews/><ref name=Anderson>Anderson, J. D.; ''et al''. "Galileo Gravity Results and the Internal Structure of Io". ''Science'' 272:709–712, 1996.</ref> | | Io is more dense even than Earth's Moon and in fact is more dense than any other satellite of Jupiter (or any other planet).<ref name=ssdphys/> For that reason, and taking into account mass-concentration and other findings from flybys of all the Galilean satellites, Io is ''not'' suspected of having an underground saltwater ocean. Instead, it likely has a metal core of [[iron]] and/or [[iron sulfide]]. According to the best model available so far, the radius of this core likely extends to half the total radius of Io itself. Surrounding this would be a partially molten silicate-rich mantle with a thin rocky surface crust.<ref name=solarviews/><ref name=Anderson>Anderson, J. D.; ''et al''. "Galileo Gravity Results and the Internal Structure of Io". ''Science'' 272:709–712, 1996.</ref> |
| | + | |
| | + | Further evidence that Io has an iron core comes from magnetometric measurements taken by Galileo. The magnetic flux density at Io's equator is about 13 milligauss<ref name=Kevelson/>. This corresponds to a magnetic dipole moment of 7.86 * 10<sup>19</sup> N-m/T. Considering Io's mass, Io likely had a magnetic dipole moment ''at creation'' of 2.1 * 10<sup>22</sup> N-m/T, according to [[Russell Humphreys]]' model for the creation of celestial magnetic fields.<ref name=Humphreys>Humphreys, D. R. "[http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/21/21_3/21_3.html The Creation of Planetary Magnetic Fields]." ''[[Creation Research Society Quarterly]]'' 21(3), December 1984. Accessed April 29, 2008.</ref> This in turn suggests a decay time of 1098 Julian years and a half-life of 761 Julian years. The corresponding decay time and half-life of the magnetic field of [[Ganymede]] agrees with this to within four significant digits, and suggests that both satellites have comparable core radii and conductivities. |
| | | | |
| | The marked difference between Io's interior and those of its three outer counterparts has not gone unremarked. [[Uniformitarianism|Uniformitarian]] thinkers suggest that Jupiter was at its hottest early in its initial accretion, and that lighter [[element]]s and [[compound]]s would not have been able to accrete as close to Jupiter as Io's orbit was. In this scenario, Jupiter is held to be the center of a "mini-solar system" with heavier elements and compounds accreting inward and lighter substances accreting outward.<ref name=solarviews/><ref name=Harmsworth>The concept of Jupiter as a proto-[[star]] that somehow failed to ignite is fairly widely held. This model states that Jupiter, composed as it is of [[hydrogen]] and [[helium]], would have ignited had it been sufficiently massive. But in that event, life on [[Earth]] could never have developed. See Harmsworth, Andrew, "[http://www.harmsy.freeuk.com/jupiter.html Entry for Jupiter]," ''Spacetech's Orrery: the Solar Sytem in Action'', last update July 2, 2007. Accessed February 18, 2008.</ref> | | The marked difference between Io's interior and those of its three outer counterparts has not gone unremarked. [[Uniformitarianism|Uniformitarian]] thinkers suggest that Jupiter was at its hottest early in its initial accretion, and that lighter [[element]]s and [[compound]]s would not have been able to accrete as close to Jupiter as Io's orbit was. In this scenario, Jupiter is held to be the center of a "mini-solar system" with heavier elements and compounds accreting inward and lighter substances accreting outward.<ref name=solarviews/><ref name=Harmsworth>The concept of Jupiter as a proto-[[star]] that somehow failed to ignite is fairly widely held. This model states that Jupiter, composed as it is of [[hydrogen]] and [[helium]], would have ignited had it been sufficiently massive. But in that event, life on [[Earth]] could never have developed. See Harmsworth, Andrew, "[http://www.harmsy.freeuk.com/jupiter.html Entry for Jupiter]," ''Spacetech's Orrery: the Solar Sytem in Action'', last update July 2, 2007. Accessed February 18, 2008.</ref> |