Difference between revisions of "Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct?"

Revision as of 14:44, May 21, 2008

What makes one supernatural explanation of something more valid than another? I feel this is a central problem of religion- we tend to accept the beliefs that are prevalent in our own culture despite there being numerous non-natural explanations for the same things.

Difference between revisions of "Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct?"

Revision as of 14:44, May 21, 2008

Navigation menu

Search

Revision as of 14:43, May 21, 2008 (view source) Philip J. Rayment (talk \| contribs) m (If we are not to be naturalists, what are our criterea for deciding which supernatural explanations are to be believed? moved to Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanations is correct?: Add "debate" prefix, and shor) ← Older edit	Revision as of 14:44, May 21, 2008 (view source) Philip J. Rayment (talk \| contribs) m (Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanations is correct? moved to Debate: If not naturalism, how do we decide which supernatural explanation is correct?: plural->singular) Newer edit →
(No difference)