Difference between revisions of "Talk:Communist Party of the United States of America"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tmtoulouse (talk | contribs) |
Hojimachong (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I have to site the CP violations on this page to be believed. Follow BillOReillyfan's link...the first two paragraphs are verbatim. I am not going through the rest right until its unlocked. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:07, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | I have to site the CP violations on this page to be believed. Follow BillOReillyfan's link...the first two paragraphs are verbatim. I am not going through the rest right until its unlocked. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 14:07, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I seriously suggest page-blanking until resolution. It can be worked on in user sandboxes, and patched together later. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 14:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:14, March 18, 2007
This is all stolen content from [1]. It should be removed immediately. --BillOReillyFan 13:44, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Please review, it's not. It's all authored by me and another editor. RobS 13:56, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Are you absolutely sure? Did you apply it to teachersparadise.com?
- I am reviewing there is a lot of material thats word for word from the site linked...Tmtoulouse 13:59, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- The second paragraph certainly looks identical to me. Dpbsmith 14:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Okay its a mixture of copy right and original from what I can tell, this needs to be gone over with a fine tooth comb. Tmtoulouse 14:00, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- Agree. By the way, it's virtually certain that the original source is Wikipedia. [2] appears to be a Wikipedia "mirror," and probably is a slightly out-of-date version of the current WIkipedia article. Dpbsmith 14:02, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- All this is moot now since its been locked. --BillOReillyFan 14:03, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
It needs to be unlocked right away, it should NEVER have been locked to begin with. I left a message at RobS. Tmtoulouse 14:05, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
I have to site the CP violations on this page to be believed. Follow BillOReillyfan's link...the first two paragraphs are verbatim. I am not going through the rest right until its unlocked. Tmtoulouse 14:07, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
- I seriously suggest page-blanking until resolution. It can be worked on in user sandboxes, and patched together later. --Hojimachongtalk 14:14, 18 March 2007 (EDT)