Difference between revisions of "Creationism, Ideology, and Science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: '''''Creationism, Ideology, and Science''''' is an article by Eugenie Scott which outlines the NCSE position on the teaching of evolution as being in sharp opposition to half of Americ...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''''Creationism, Ideology, and Science''''' is an article by [[Eugenie Scott]] which outlines the NCSE position on the teaching of evolution as being in sharp opposition to half of Americans' religious ideas. While she freely admits that evolution is opposed to [[Young Earth Creationism]], | + | '''''Creationism, Ideology, and Science''''' is an article by [[Eugenie Scott]] which outlines the [[NCSE]] position on the teaching of evolution as being in sharp opposition to half of Americans' religious ideas. While she freely admits that evolution is opposed to [[Young Earth Creationism]], |
| − | she uses confusing terminology (such as "[[ | + | she uses confusing terminology (such as "[[theistic evolutionism]]" to imply that evolution is compatible with [[Old Earth Creationism]] as well. She implies that major Protestant groups along with the Roman Catholic Church have accepted evolution, by being vague about which [[aspects of evolution]] she means when making the claim. |
| + | |||
| + | ==External links== | ||
| + | *[http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/830_creationism_ideology_and_sci_6_24_1996.asp Creationism, Ideology, and Science] | ||
Revision as of 18:57, May 22, 2008
Creationism, Ideology, and Science is an article by Eugenie Scott which outlines the NCSE position on the teaching of evolution as being in sharp opposition to half of Americans' religious ideas. While she freely admits that evolution is opposed to Young Earth Creationism, she uses confusing terminology (such as "theistic evolutionism" to imply that evolution is compatible with Old Earth Creationism as well. She implies that major Protestant groups along with the Roman Catholic Church have accepted evolution, by being vague about which aspects of evolution she means when making the claim.