Difference between revisions of "User talk:AndrasK"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (there, forgot signature...)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I would strongly suggest... you familiarize yourself with the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|90/10 rule]], as it is not infrequently wielded against perceived troublemakers. In other words, please make some useful additions to non-controversial articles, in order to demonstrate your desire to improve the site overall. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:06, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
 
I would strongly suggest... you familiarize yourself with the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|90/10 rule]], as it is not infrequently wielded against perceived troublemakers. In other words, please make some useful additions to non-controversial articles, in order to demonstrate your desire to improve the site overall. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 23:06, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Your profile offends me greatly. You are such a liberal and I cannot even understand why you were allowed on this site. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 16:20, 22 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:20, May 22, 2008

Welcome!

Hello, AndrasK, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, AndrasK!


I would strongly suggest... you familiarize yourself with the 90/10 rule, as it is not infrequently wielded against perceived troublemakers. In other words, please make some useful additions to non-controversial articles, in order to demonstrate your desire to improve the site overall. Feebasfactor 23:06, 27 April 2008 (EDT)


Your profile offends me greatly. You are such a liberal and I cannot even understand why you were allowed on this site. --IlTrovatore 16:20, 22 May 2008 (EDT)