Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause.)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]
 
:The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]
  
−
See also:
+
==See also==
 
*[[Creationism]]
 
*[[Creationism]]
 +
 +
[[Category:Evolution]]
 +
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]

Revision as of 17:22, May 23, 2008

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [1]

See also