Difference between revisions of "Testability of intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA: :It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the tes...) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html] | :It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a [[Intelligent Designer|designer]] is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is [[Darwinian evolution]]. The claim of the [[evolutionary biologists]] is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html] | ||
| − | See also | + | ==See also== |
*[[Creationism]] | *[[Creationism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Intelligent Design]] | ||
Revision as of 17:23, May 23, 2008
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
- It is sometimes said that the hypothesis that there is a designer is untestable. This is false. It is testable, and the test is Darwinian evolution. The claim of the evolutionary biologists is that unintelligent causes did the whole job. If they can prove it, then the counter-hypothesis that you need intelligence has been tested, and it has been shown to be false. [1]