Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evolution and liberalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: This should probably go on the evolution page, not given a new article of its own. It's not a topic unto itself, it's a statistic about an issue, and so it should be on that issue's p...) |
(your source does not say this) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This should probably go on the [[evolution]] page, not given a new article of its own. It's not a topic unto itself, it's a statistic about an issue, and so it should be on that issue's page.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 16:33, 25 May 2008 (EDT) | This should probably go on the [[evolution]] page, not given a new article of its own. It's not a topic unto itself, it's a statistic about an issue, and so it should be on that issue's page.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 16:33, 25 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This source says nothing about 36% of liberals believing in evolution. All it says is that 64% of conservatives do not believe in evolution. That would mean that 36% of conservatives believe in evolution, and would be contrary to what you are trying to imply. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:35, 25 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:35, May 25, 2008
This should probably go on the evolution page, not given a new article of its own. It's not a topic unto itself, it's a statistic about an issue, and so it should be on that issue's page.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 16:33, 25 May 2008 (EDT)
- This source says nothing about 36% of liberals believing in evolution. All it says is that 64% of conservatives do not believe in evolution. That would mean that 36% of conservatives believe in evolution, and would be contrary to what you are trying to imply. DanH 17:35, 25 May 2008 (EDT)