Difference between revisions of "Talk:Redshift"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Doppler Effect: Expansion of space, not movement.) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Doppler Effect== | ==Doppler Effect== | ||
Isn't this an example of the Doppler Effect? Not merely analogous to it? [[User:KingOfNothing|KingOfNothing]] 20:43, 26 May 2008 (EDT) | Isn't this an example of the Doppler Effect? Not merely analogous to it? [[User:KingOfNothing|KingOfNothing]] 20:43, 26 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | : I'm not sure that the article expresses it all that well, but the Doppler effect is produced by the source moving relative to the observer, whereas some if not most of the redshift is not due to the source moving through space, but due to the space itself between the source and observer expanding (as part of the expansion of the universe). [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:08, 27 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:08, May 27, 2008
My Edits
I edited for grammar and added the "Support for Big Bang" section, a stub. It should be added to immensely, as my knowledge of physics only goes into a basic understanding of electromagnetism and relativity. --Pastafarian
Doppler Effect
Isn't this an example of the Doppler Effect? Not merely analogous to it? KingOfNothing 20:43, 26 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not sure that the article expresses it all that well, but the Doppler effect is produced by the source moving relative to the observer, whereas some if not most of the redshift is not due to the source moving through space, but due to the space itself between the source and observer expanding (as part of the expansion of the universe). Philip J. Rayment 08:08, 27 May 2008 (EDT)