1,106
edits
Changes
no edit summary
In 1952 Ron Hubbard gave a one hour, public lecture entitled, ''Scientology: Milestone One''. In it, he defined the word, he spelled out why he used that particular word, where he was going with the idea and defined the basis of using that word. A google map search yields 6000 + Scientology locations. None of them are connected with the use of the word prior to the Church of Scientology. So why mention the word history in a brief article? Any websearch gives millions of results, almost all are about the Church of Scientology. Any news search gives hundreds (or more) results, all of them about the Church of Scientology. So why a word history study in a brief article ?[[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 02:59, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
In 1952 Ron Hubbard gave a one hour, public lecture entitled, ''Scientology: Milestone One''. In it, he defined the word, he spelled out why he used that particular word, where he was going with the idea and defined the basis of using that word. A google map search yields 6000 + Scientology locations. None of them are connected with the use of the word prior to the Church of Scientology. So why mention the word history in a brief article? Any websearch gives millions of results, almost all are about the Church of Scientology. Any news search gives hundreds (or more) results, all of them about the Church of Scientology. So why a word history study in a brief article ?[[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 02:59, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
==Significant changes to the article==
Several of us have changed the article quiet a bit, the most controversial of these changes will involve the criticism section and the use of xenu.net, also perhaps what calling L. Ron Hubbard a science fiction writer, which he is, and maybe the use of the term religion. I also assume there are other issues that will need to be discussed so lets bring them here. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 16:55, 18 March 2007 (EDT)