Difference between revisions of "Talk:Choose Life License Plates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(can i disagree?) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:It very well might be ironic, but that's irrelevant. "Pro-choice" is the accepted terminology even in conservative writings. [[User:SamSamson|SamSamson]] 16:38, 28 May 2008 (EDT) | :It very well might be ironic, but that's irrelevant. "Pro-choice" is the accepted terminology even in conservative writings. [[User:SamSamson|SamSamson]] 16:38, 28 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Not here, so if you see something that says "pro-abortion", it stays. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:00, 28 May 2008 (EDT) | ::Not here, so if you see something that says "pro-abortion", it stays. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:00, 28 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Ok. How so? When was that decided? In other words, how and where do we decide what terminology is accepted? [[User:SamSamson|SamSamson]] 02:26, 29 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:26, May 29, 2008
"Pro-choice groups have fought against the right of drivers to have "choose life" license plates, and sued to stop them in some jurisdictions."
SamSamson's edit in which he changed the words "Pro-abortion" to "Pro-choice" is pretty-much ironic now. All that happened was an admission that pro-choice people do not like other people's choices, even to the point of a "choose life" licence plate. Karajou 16:28, 28 May 2008 (EDT)
- It very well might be ironic, but that's irrelevant. "Pro-choice" is the accepted terminology even in conservative writings. SamSamson 16:38, 28 May 2008 (EDT)