5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 424:
Line 424: + + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 02:30, May 31, 2008
, 02:30, May 31, 2008→Uh, no...
Until ID actually presents a valid scientific argument, it shouldn't be in science class. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 17:44, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
Until ID actually presents a valid scientific argument, it shouldn't be in science class. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 17:44, 26 April 2008 (EDT)
<big>'''What if we nab Him and He says "I didn't do it?'''</big>
From what I understand from the ongoing debate, scientists/evolutionists take the stand that a theory cannot be considered scientific if it cannot be falsifiable, or proven wrong. For example, the current theory of evolution could be proven wrong if in the future we excavate human bones in a jurassic layer. (Actually, wouldn't that just push the time frame back a bit?) Therefore evolution theory is scientific. Evolutionists say that since there is no way to disprove whether God created the world, the theory of intelligent design is not science, and cannot be taught in science class. In fact, there is one way to falsify the theory of intelligent design, isn't there? What if, someday, we run into God, and He denies having created the world? That would falsify the theory of intelligent design, making ID, by definition, science.