Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Redirecting to HAGGER?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]: | |
| + | :The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==See also== | ||
| + | *[[Creationism]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Evolution]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Intelligent Design]] | ||
Revision as of 00:20, June 2, 2008
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
- The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [1]
The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself. [2]