Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]: | [[Phillip E. Johnson]] told [[NOVA]]: | ||
| − | + | {{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an [[intelligent cause]]. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/defense-id.html]}} | |
{{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]}} | {{quotebox|The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]}} | ||
Revision as of 00:52, June 2, 2008
Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:
The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [1]
The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself. [2]