Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pangaea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Please Explain: These may help) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Please Explain== | ==Please Explain== | ||
| − | Do I need to add anymore than that? How do you propose the flood broke up the super-continent to form the world as we know it in a year? From the miniature tectonic activities we have in our current environment causing the massive natural disasters they do, would this not have destroyed the world with mega-earthquakes and unending volcanic eruptions, changing the very chemical make-up of the atmosphere? | + | Do I need to add anymore than that? How do you propose the flood broke up the super-continent to form the world as we know it in a year? From the miniature tectonic activities we have in our current environment causing the massive natural disasters they do, would this not have destroyed the world with mega-earthquakes and unending volcanic eruptions, changing the very chemical make-up of the atmosphere?{{unsigned|Entheogenicorder}} |
: You might like to have a look over the articles [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/3037/ here]. I can't say, though, whether those specific points are addressed, but then you've not been too specific about the effects. The ''intention'' was to destroy the world (in a sense, but perhaps not the sense you mean?). And although I'm sure that the volcanic activity ''affected'' the atmosphere, suggesting that it would have "[changed] the very chemical make-up" of it seems a bit overboard. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:23, 19 February 2008 (EST) | : You might like to have a look over the articles [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/3037/ here]. I can't say, though, whether those specific points are addressed, but then you've not been too specific about the effects. The ''intention'' was to destroy the world (in a sense, but perhaps not the sense you mean?). And although I'm sure that the volcanic activity ''affected'' the atmosphere, suggesting that it would have "[changed] the very chemical make-up" of it seems a bit overboard. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:23, 19 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:31, June 2, 2008
Please Explain
Do I need to add anymore than that? How do you propose the flood broke up the super-continent to form the world as we know it in a year? From the miniature tectonic activities we have in our current environment causing the massive natural disasters they do, would this not have destroyed the world with mega-earthquakes and unending volcanic eruptions, changing the very chemical make-up of the atmosphere?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Entheogenicorder (talk)
- You might like to have a look over the articles here. I can't say, though, whether those specific points are addressed, but then you've not been too specific about the effects. The intention was to destroy the world (in a sense, but perhaps not the sense you mean?). And although I'm sure that the volcanic activity affected the atmosphere, suggesting that it would have "[changed] the very chemical make-up" of it seems a bit overboard. Philip J. Rayment 03:23, 19 February 2008 (EST)