Difference between revisions of "Talk:Espionage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Uhhh, James bond is a ''fictional'' character, is he not? Or is that not considered a partucularly useful distinction?) |
(Request to correct French) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Uhhh, James bond is a ''fictional'' character, is he not? Or is that not considered a partucularly useful distinction? | Uhhh, James bond is a ''fictional'' character, is he not? Or is that not considered a partucularly useful distinction? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have only just joined and I'm unsure whether to just go ahead and edit this or not... I don't wish to offend the writer of the article, but I am French and your French is wrong! The word Espionage comes from the French word espio''nn''age, 2 ''n''s, which is not a verb meaning "to spy", but a noun meaning "spying". The verb is espio''nn''er. | ||
Revision as of 15:38, June 3, 2008
Uhhh, James bond is a fictional character, is he not? Or is that not considered a partucularly useful distinction?
I have only just joined and I'm unsure whether to just go ahead and edit this or not... I don't wish to offend the writer of the article, but I am French and your French is wrong! The word Espionage comes from the French word espionnage, 2 ns, which is not a verb meaning "to spy", but a noun meaning "spying". The verb is espionner.