Difference between revisions of "Talk:Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging"
(PeteSC's point is redundant because the AWB changed its principles in 1988) |
(Blanket term is unacceptable) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[User:Alfred123|Alfred123]] 21:20, 5 June 2008 (EDT) | [[User:Alfred123|Alfred123]] 21:20, 5 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Blanket term is unacceptable == | ||
| + | |||
| + | When [[User:Murray]] editted the article he desiganted the Bophuthatswana coup as terrorist, even though, as part of the Afrikaner Volksfront, the AWB had the right to be in Bophuthatswana. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Alfred123|Alfred123]] 05:36, 6 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:36, June 6, 2008
Goodness... This article is remarkably pro-AWB - an organisation which, in the words of the author of the article, "demands the maintenance of the division of White and non-White people". PeteSC 11:05, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Please attempt to justify your statement instead of just saying "It's pro-AWB". Cite something please.
Alfred123 12:18, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Also the AWB amended its program of principles in 1988, omitting most references to race, as the emphasis of the group shifted on to culture.
Also the anti-Zionist statements present in the first program of principles were absent in the second.
Alfred123 21:20, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
Blanket term is unacceptable
When User:Murray editted the article he desiganted the Bophuthatswana coup as terrorist, even though, as part of the Afrikaner Volksfront, the AWB had the right to be in Bophuthatswana.
Alfred123 05:36, 6 June 2008 (EDT)