Talk:BBC News

Should the BBC be allowed as a referring source if it allows this sort of contentand this.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by republican (talk)

...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --Hojimachong^talk 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

I am wondering about here Conservative and myself seem to be in a quandrywhat do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">republican

Well, the notion that the oldest, largest, and most well-respected news corporation on earth shouldn't be used as a source is completely ridiculous in any respect. If you can't use BBC, then of course CNN, FOX, Al-Jazeera (no pun intended), MSNBC, ABC News, CSM, etc. wouldn't be authoritative at all. A news Corp. reports news; that is, they report on the finding of other people. --Hojimachong^talk 21:42, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

So should the theory of evolution page allow this article in reference to ther peoples views and findings? Because it was reverted. republican