Difference between revisions of "User talk:HenryS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (cleaning old stuff)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{welcome|sig=<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 23:59, 8 April 2008 (EDT)}}
+
<center>''Complain below, please''</center>
−
 
 
−
Now I see that you are back. Great. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 21:08, 1 November 2007 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Welcome back!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:14, 11 January 2008 (EST)
 
−
 
 
−
: Are you back? --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:21, 5 February 2008 (EST)
 
−
 
 
−
== My vandal counter ==
 
−
 
 
−
It's there, but I had to hide it, because it attracted too many <s>Bohdans</s> vandals. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:03, 5 February 2008 (EST)
 
−
 
 
−
Could you have a read of [[Holodomor denial]]. Thanks.--[[User:Bandurist|Bandurist]] 12:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 
−
 
 
−
== Sysop ==
 
−
 
 
−
Welcome back to your Sysop status, Bohdan!  We've missed you, and your expertise about Eastern Europe.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)
 
−
:Thanks!  But I might not be very active... Nevertheles, I will try to help. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)
 
−
::Congratulations Bohdan. [[User:Absentismens|Absentismens]] 01:26, 3 March 2008 (EST)
 
−
 
 
−
== Question ==
 
−
 
 
−
Is there a place I can ask the community as a whole something?--'''''<span style="border: 2px #000000 solid;background:#FFD800; font-variant:small-caps">[[User:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Fellow</font>]][[User talk:FellowChristian16|<font color="#000000">Christian16</font>]]</span>''''' 16:36, 19 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
I also have a question.  Currently there are three broken redirects.  Should I delete the redirects and request deletion of the page? or just name the pages and allow a sysop to delete them? [[User:DrCB|DrCB]] 21:35, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Really random ==
 
−
 
 
−
I was taking a nap today and you were in my dream. I had a dream that my real life cat (who's name is Jazz... my secret's out) was actually a housefly, and not a cat. And then my cousin found out that she was actually a unicorn and she was flying around the house trying to catch and eat my pet fly. And then it wasn't my pet cat/fly named Jazz, it was my pet cat/fly named Bohdan. I was all like "oh no, cousin! Don't eat Bohdan, I will be sad!"
 
−
 
 
−
I have strange dreams. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:I am so honored :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:39, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== deletion of lawyer values ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dear Bohdan,
 
−
 
 
−
Could you please explain why you deleted this article?
 
−
 
 
−
thanks--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:41, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
also what is this WP:POINT?--[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 16:50, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:It was unencyclopedic, and obviously just a response to [[professor values]]. If you have a problem with that article, go to the [[Talk:Professor values|talk page]]. Please do not create unencyclopedic articles to make a point. It is disruptive. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:51, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
WP:POINT is a policy on wikipedia. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:POINT] [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 16:52, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
::Dear Bohdan
 
−
How can you say [[Lawyer values]] is unencyclopedic and disruptive while [[Professor values]] are not? It was not just a response to the Professor values, but was inspired by it! I do not believe it was in any way disruptive. I am sure the public opinion about lawyers are more in line with what I wrote while the public still respect Professors. --[[User:JBuscombe|JBuscombe]] 17:04, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::::I point you to the newly-created [[logical fallacy#Ad hominem tu quoque|tu quoque]]. You don't have to show that professor values is right to show that lawyer values is wrong. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 21:35, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::I actually never said I consider professor values to be encyclopedic.  But the author of that article is the owner of the site, and he has said before that it won't be deleted.  Please take any issues you have with professor values to its talk page. Thanks, [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:57, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::::Did you just delete something for breaking a rule that ''doesn't exist on this site''?  --[[User:Gulik5|Gulik5]] 21:32, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::::No.  Please read the above discussion, especially where I say it was unencyclopedic. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:51, 29 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
The CP Commandments demand the truth.  Bohdan was right, IMO.  However the real point is, he answered the question as to why he removed it, clearly and concisely. Editors who keep repeating and asking in several different ways are indeed just trying to be disruptive. It is the job of CP Sysops to decide those questions, "what is encyclopedic" and what isn't. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:40, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Request ==
 
−
 
 
−
Dear Bohdan, I am currently trying to get night edit rights so that I can better contribute to Conservapedia. As a sysop who has had experience working with me, I would like to ask for your support. If you feel that I deserve edit rights, please say so [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Request_.2F_question|here]]. If you do not think I deserve them, I fully understand and I thank you anyway. Sincerely, [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 01:19, 30 March 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==EdBot==
 
−
 
 
−
I had a feeling that letting it sleep only 6 seconds between edits would trigger something. Thanks for the unblock. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:I will keep an eye on this guard dog.  He will regret the next time he messes with Edbot.  [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 20:29, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
==Admin review==
 
−
 
 
−
Speaking of regret, what do you think of my block on [[User:Adg2011]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:00, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:I just logged in now.  A quick look at his contribs reveals some POV edits, but mostly talk page complaining.  I probably wouldn't have blocked him for what I saw, but I just glanced.  Was there something specific he was blocked for? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:09, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::Almost in violation of 90/10, and too many reverts. Not an auspicious start. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:12, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::agreed. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 22:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== I am sorry ==
 
−
 
 
−
I will never again forget to sign my posts. Nor will I press the tilde key one too many times. Nor will I sign on a mainspace page, then forget to sign on a talk page. Please accept my utmost apologies. ~~
 
−
 
 
−
PS: I saw when you unblocked me the other night. I was doing my work, then all the sudden I had this urge to stop working. I look at the recent changes and lo and behold, Bohdan unblocked me. ~
 
−
 
 
−
==Subliminal messages==
 
−
 
 
−
I don't know, but I feel somehow you want me to get in touch with you. Could it be a subliminal message of some kind? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:10, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== If it will help...... ==
 
−
 
 
−
I will be pleased to address you as Henry!  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 22:57, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Don't forget the "s". [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:09, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::There's more than one of you? That's confusing! [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:11, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::Sorry, HenryS, but my earlier post was made before the transmogrification was made from Henry to HenryS. ;-)  I was just a bit ahead of you and Andy. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 00:14, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Contribution warning ==
 
−
I took ASchafly's warning about the 90/10 rule seriously, and have only posted a few brief questions  (and a fact about superdelegates he acknowledged as helpful) since then, instead of engaging in long debates as I've done prior.  I'm researching some articles to contribute, but if even this level of talk activity is a violation, then I'm not sure if this site is worth the effort.  I may be verbose, but I've always felt that a thoughtful, respectful discussion about controversial issues can be as educational as the underlying articles themselves. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 00:19, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:It less of a warning, more like friendly advice so there would be no warning.  And while thoughtful and respectful discussion about issues is educational, it won't help the encyclopedia grow, nor benefit the article readers who have no interest in talk pages. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== "taking out the trash" ==
 
−
 
 
−
You do know that you just completely confirmed that Conservative was talking about and to a site Conservapedia is apparently afraid of to the degree of putting its name into the spam filter, right?
 
−
 
 
−
But riddle me this: If sysops openly address that satellite in specifically created userspace articles, why is explicitly mentioning it apparently classified as "trash"? --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:07, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Let it go, friend, let it go. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:12, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::You tried to [[deceit|deceive]] me and another user when we asked a question, and then you labeled my comments (and those of others) as "trash". I'm sorry, but I don't think that this is a good basis to call someone "friend".
 
−
::Also, the combination of "site name in spam filter + attempted to mislead users + wiping out any mention of the name" is basically telling people to most definitely go there. If so much work has been done to deny the existence of a site, then it just has to be extremely interesting.
 
−
::But hey, I've seen the extremes you're willing to go to, so I won't bring the site name on this site here. --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:26, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::Okay, online acquaintance.  Go ahead and go there if you want.  But here, please drop this and don't bring it up again. Thanks, [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:31, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
::::You got it, [http://avatar.wikia.com/wiki/Long_Feng Long Feng]. --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:42, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks[[User:Dalek|Dalek]]
 
−
 
 
−
You can't be serious about calling HelpJazz "too liberal" on your userpage. That would be horrible thing to say about another contributor, (especially since a number of admins support him being granted night-editing rights)[[User:Dalek|Dalek]] 16:23, 14 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Joke. I am one of the admins who supports him. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:45, 14 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== thanks ==
 
−
Thank you for that recent block you just made, I was looking for an admin to report it to. ^.^ --[[User:ITSAMEMARIO|ITSAMEMARIO]] 21:37, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:You're welcome. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 21:39, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== A major online conservative christian newspaper..... ==
 
−
 
 
−
A major online conservative christian newspaper is very interested in regards to Conservapedia's [[atheism]] article and the reporter said she would very likely do a story on it.  She said her readers are VERY interested in the subject of atheism and the story that we are promoting our article and that some major Christian internet ministries have started to feature our article is a good story.  I am making the conservapedia [[atheism]] article the article of the month which I think fits in nicely with the Expelled controversy.  I have sent Andy an email on this matter and I am awaiting an answer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 14:45, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Wow. Sounds exciting. Which newspaper is it? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:02, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Thanks for the welcome.  BUT. ==
 
−
 
 
−
Hi!  So, yes, Bohdan, it was mean, but it was also accurate.  The gaybashing this man trumps up is significantly worse - but comparable to - the lies he puts up about evolution and liberals.  He's an embarrassment who's afraid of conflict, because he'll be proved wrong.-[[User:TJefferson|TJefferson]] 19:49, 1 May 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Did you just call me a "but"?  You really are ''very'' unkind. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]]
 
−
 
 
−
== Reply to Ames ==
 
−
 
 
−
No, your examples are not true. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:09, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Demonstration ==
 
−
 
 
−
I hereby declare you zinged, Shabby. You're just lucky I have so many of these things. [[User:BlueMouse|BlueMouse]] 23:13, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== Thanks 2 ==
 
−
 
 
−
Thanks, HenryS, for '''protecting''' all the aircraft images I uploaded!
 
−
 
 
−
--[[User:DuncanB|DuncanB]] 16:56, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
==Faith healing==
 
−
The article is a stub by putting the template on there it might convince someone to edit it to make it more long --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah|Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 23:46, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:I know, but can you work on it and make it more like the template at wikipedia?  Our template currently looks bad.  And that article isn't too stubby, it has content and a reference. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 23:48, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
A non-stub article looks like [[Shogi]] --<span style="margin-top: -3px;">&nbsp;[[Image:50 star flag.png|12px]]</span><span style="position:relative; overflow:hidden; width:88px; height:15px; z-index:2;"> [[User:Deborah|Deborah]] [[Special:Contributions/Deborah|<font color="gray">(contributions)</font>]] [[User_talk:Deborah|<font color="darkslategray">(talk)</font>]]</span> 23:51, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:Yes, but faith healing contained enough content that I would consider it not a stub.  And Aschlafly has said before Conservapedia stays away from the stub template.  Read #12 [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia|here]]. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 23:56, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
== McCain Edit ==
 
−
 
 
−
Will you be making the same change for the Barack Obama article that you made to the McCain article?  I'm not sure what your reasoning was for taking it out of the intro, and then out of the article completely. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:20, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:What does this have to do with the Barack Obama article? If you don't understand why things like that don't belong in the lead, I will refer you to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LEAD this]. Is is a good summary of what should compose that which we call a "lead". Keep in mind it is not conservapedia site policy and others are not obliged to do what it says, but it is a good guidline to follow. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 14:25, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::My point in remarking was I would hope that you would do the same cleanup of the Obama lead as you did with the McCain lead.  I'm sure if I attempted to do the same cleanup, I'd find myself banned.  Therefore I was hoping you would stay consistent and clean up both leads.  Consider this my request for you to do so, or permission to do so without being banned. 
 
−
 
 
−
::Also, in regards to the McCain gaffes--it was important to make note of those gaffes, or at least as much as the notation of the gaffes that have been posted on the Obama article (i.e. referring to 57 states when he meant to say 47 states). --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:30, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
:::Do you agree that "I will veto every single beer...er, bill" does not belong in an encyclopedia?  I do agree with you that much of what is in the Obama lead does not belong there, though it probably does belong in the article itself.  Here is the problem with the Obama article: much of it was written by this sites owner.  The best thing to do would be to (politely) bring up the status of the lead on the talk page.  I'm sure other editors (hint, hint) would support you. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 14:39, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::I think the line belongs in there slightly more than the conspiracy theory that Obama stating "57 states" was a reference to the number of Islamic states worldwide.  More importantly, though, I think the quote belongs in that it is part of a larger theme of the problems of McCain's speaking style--i.e. tends to make gaffes.  Is it a make-or-break line?  No, and you can remove it. But I think that he does have trouble reading from teleprompters that has been noted in a number of media outlets---conservative included---and is an important part of image-heavy presidential elections in this day and age of soundbites and "gotcha" politics. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 14:44, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 01:33, June 13, 2008

Complain below, please
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:HenryS&oldid=472729"