Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Sixties"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Bad light== You have painted 1960's in a very harsh light. It was a period that needed to take place and wasnt ''all'' bad ~~~~)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
You have painted 1960's in a very harsh light. It was a period that needed to take place and wasnt ''all'' bad
 
You have painted 1960's in a very harsh light. It was a period that needed to take place and wasnt ''all'' bad
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 06:14, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 06:14, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
:No. The Sixties have been painted as a fount of all that is good, and it is important to redress this. Most of what is bad in modern society either originated in, or became much worse as a result of, the idiocies and moral vacuities of that decade. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 06:17, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:17, June 13, 2008

Bad light

You have painted 1960's in a very harsh light. It was a period that needed to take place and wasnt all bad AdenJ 06:14, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

No. The Sixties have been painted as a fount of all that is good, and it is important to redress this. Most of what is bad in modern society either originated in, or became much worse as a result of, the idiocies and moral vacuities of that decade. Bugler 06:17, 13 June 2008 (EDT)