250
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + +
This is clearly a content dispute
::Describing The Beatles, the Rolling Stones and Hunter S Thompson as 'great' and 'successes' is clearly at odds with the article, not least because they are part of the problem with their promotion of hedonistic and drug-fuelled lifestyles. By all means write a separate section on music and the arts, but do not let it be filled with the sort of hippy, summer-of-love, pink-tinted-spectacles view of the sixties that urgently needs to be debunked. And I am removing it from the 'successes' para; please do not replace it, or I will block. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:49, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
::Describing The Beatles, the Rolling Stones and Hunter S Thompson as 'great' and 'successes' is clearly at odds with the article, not least because they are part of the problem with their promotion of hedonistic and drug-fuelled lifestyles. By all means write a separate section on music and the arts, but do not let it be filled with the sort of hippy, summer-of-love, pink-tinted-spectacles view of the sixties that urgently needs to be debunked. And I am removing it from the 'successes' para; please do not replace it, or I will block. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 08:49, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
:::This is clearly a content dispute, one editor wants a phrase in whereas another wants it removed. There should be no blocks unless there is an edit war, in which both editors should be blocked. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 08:53, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
the Beatles are one of the greatest bands of all time. Ditto the rolling stones. Hunter Thompsons began a whole new form of journalism which is yet to be matched. Not great you say?
the Beatles are one of the greatest bands of all time. Ditto the rolling stones. Hunter Thompsons began a whole new form of journalism which is yet to be matched. Not great you say?
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 08:52, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 08:52, 13 June 2008 (EDT)