Changes

→‎Sources: Wieland and Doyle
Line 42: Line 42:  
* New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9020.html Oldest snake fossil shows a bit of leg], 19th April, 2006
 
* New Scientist [http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9020.html Oldest snake fossil shows a bit of leg], 19th April, 2006
 
* Wilkinson, Richard, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/559 Cutting out a useless vestigial argument], ''Creation'' 26(3):51, June 2004.
 
* Wilkinson, Richard, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/559 Cutting out a useless vestigial argument], ''Creation'' 26(3):51, June 2004.
 +
* Wieland, Carl, and Doyle, Shaun, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/5756 More musings on our ‘useless’ appendix], May 2008 (Creation Ministries International).
 
* Zimmer, Carl, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1511/is_n7_v18/ai_19560108 How the snake lost its legs: Snakes, researchers once thought, descended from humble burrowing lizards. New evidence suggests a marine pedigree, and a family tree that includes 45-foot reptiles], Discover, July 1997.
 
* Zimmer, Carl, [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1511/is_n7_v18/ai_19560108 How the snake lost its legs: Snakes, researchers once thought, descended from humble burrowing lizards. New evidence suggests a marine pedigree, and a family tree that includes 45-foot reptiles], Discover, July 1997.
  
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits