Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Remove lots of liberal mockery and suggest spelling change.)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Suggest moving this to Essay:Lenski Dialogue or Conservapedia:Lenski Dialogue, for two reasons.
+
==Page name==
  
−
One: As with your [[A thought for Christmas]] page, this is /not/ encyclopedic content. Two: It's spelled dialogue.
+
I believe the correct spelling is dialogue.  I would suggest we move the page to match the proper spelling.  [[User:BryonRichards|BryonRichards]] 21:32, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
−
 
 
−
Godspeed. [[User:DannyRedful|DannyRedful]] 13:38, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
:While you're at it, you might do well to explain to Lenski what exactly a "Conservapedia" is. Unless he really likes Lewis Black's "The conservatives think that YOU, THE PUBLIC, HAVE A LIBERAL BIAS." quote, he's unlikely to know. After all, this site gets most of its views from a small group of devout sysops and the snarkers over at RW. Godspeed. [[User:DannyRedful|DannyRedful]] 13:49, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
[http://myxo.css.msu.edu/lenski/pdf/2008,%20PNAS,%20Blount%20et%20al.pdf Paper 180.]  All kinds of data.  If you want, I can also link to the protocols and such.  Prof. Lenski is way more obliging than we would have any right to expect... I sent him a letter of congratulations, and he even took the time to reply thanking me!--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 15:27, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::So, Andy, when can we expect your in-depth analysis of paper #180? -Drek
 
−
 
 
−
:::With a professional and comprehensive reply having been sent promptly by Professor Lenski, what would be the intended follow-up from Conservapedia?  It seems like he answered the letter's first two questions and pointed out that the third was based on a misunderstanding of his paper.  Since his study's data and methodology are freely available for review, I'm wondering who CP is looking to engage to independently review and assess his work, which has already passed peer review in order to be published. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:03, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
−
 
 
−
::::He answered, everybody scramble!  I need that Lack of Evidence in the air NOW!  You call artillery and tell them to deploy the Inconclusive Data immediately!  Move, move, move!  We've got a battle against science to fight, people!--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 17:29, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 01:32, June 14, 2008

Page name

I believe the correct spelling is dialogue. I would suggest we move the page to match the proper spelling. BryonRichards 21:32, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:Lenski_dialog&oldid=473670"