Difference between revisions of "User talk:DanielB"
(diagonalization) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
As for the Diagonalization and God section, this is a valid philosophical argument and has citations to back it up.[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:14, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | As for the Diagonalization and God section, this is a valid philosophical argument and has citations to back it up.[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 22:14, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Okay I might leave the philisophical point, but where is the axiom of choice used in that proof? [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 22:17, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:17, June 15, 2008
It's not me avoiding the question; it is you who are to rephrase it in a more respectful manner. Karajou 23:51, 27 April 2008 (EDT)
Hadn't you better re-phrase...
Laddie, hadn't you better re-phrase this?
Contempt of the administration is one of the oldest blockable offenses in the book. And you've just shown it.--TerryHTalk 23:05, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
- Can you be arrested for showing contept of the president? No contempt for leadership is on of the hallmarks of freedom. DanielB 19:29, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Quote
Love that Galilleo quote.CraigC 01:22, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
- Cheers I rather like it. DanielB 19:28, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Diagonalization
First, thank you for the full proof of the naturals vs. reals case.
Diagonalization is classically applied to show that the reals are bigger than the natural numbers, but the diagonalization argument also works to take any infinite set and construct a set of larger cardinality (namely the power set).
As for the Diagonalization and God section, this is a valid philosophical argument and has citations to back it up.Foxtrot 22:14, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
- Okay I might leave the philisophical point, but where is the axiom of choice used in that proof? DanielB 22:17, 14 June 2008 (EDT)