Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 78:
Line 78: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
== Administrative action ==
::[Edit conflict] He threatened to block a user if he couldn't provide the name of a person who was released from Guantanamo and who did not return from combat. Many people such as myself viewed this as an unfair challenge and try to prevent any damage by providing names to Aggrieved. TerryH then chose to argue against the information we provided. This is not wikistalking or trolling, it is a debate and an attempt to prevent a user being blocked for what we perceive as an unfair cause. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 20:00, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
::[Edit conflict] He threatened to block a user if he couldn't provide the name of a person who was released from Guantanamo and who did not return from combat. Many people such as myself viewed this as an unfair challenge and try to prevent any damage by providing names to Aggrieved. TerryH then chose to argue against the information we provided. This is not wikistalking or trolling, it is a debate and an attempt to prevent a user being blocked for what we perceive as an unfair cause. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 20:00, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
== == Administrative action == ==
'''''ATTENTION'''''
This user is now blocked for two weeks.
He had the bad sense to make demands of me on [[Talk:Main_Page]].
Users Wandering, StatsMsn, and AdenJ: Stay out of other users' quarrels with the administration, or you'll get the same thing that this user got. And don't you ever, '''''EVER''''', tell another administrator what to do on this site. I'm going to watch this page for another twenty-four hours. You have that long to apologize.
HenryS, thanks for the offer of assistance. But as you can see, about all that need you to do is to bear witness.
And anyone else who reads this page: The issue here is a lot larger than some people seem to realize or want to acknowledge. It's a lot bigger than somebody who got off on a technicality, and someone else on whom some Spanish judges took pity while not repeat ''not'' acquitting that someone of guilt for his offenses. It's also about unreliable sources, and about news organs that pretend to be objective when in fact they are the house organs for the Democratic Party or even for Al-Qa'ida (I speak here of Al-Jazeera, but the way some other news organs have been acting...well, you get the idea).
And that's why, as a contributor, I don't concede ''anything'' as regards detainees at Guantanamo Bay.
And as an administrator, I don't tolerate public expressions of contempt for my ''position'' as an administrator.
Let this action be a lesson that need not be repeated.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:30, 14 June 2008 (EDT)