Difference between revisions of "Talk:Greek influence on Western Culture"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
As should be obvious to anyone now, Joaquin has decided he doesn't want to discuss his edits, he just wants to keep making them over and over. Seven, eight times now. I have brought this to his attention almost as many times on his user talk, but he ignores me.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:01, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | As should be obvious to anyone now, Joaquin has decided he doesn't want to discuss his edits, he just wants to keep making them over and over. Seven, eight times now. I have brought this to his attention almost as many times on his user talk, but he ignores me.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 14:01, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Tom you may want to just let it go. It would appear that Joaquin believes you are nitpicking and that any "debate" on it is a waste of his time. He would rather create. Perhaps he feels the blockquote indentation simply gives it a better layout. Is it that important? You've expressed your concerns and been true to your own beliefs. Now it may be best to just move on. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | :Tom you may want to just let it go. It would appear that Joaquin believes you are nitpicking and that any "debate" on it is a waste of his time. He would rather create. Perhaps he feels the blockquote indentation simply gives it a better layout. Is it that important? You've expressed your concerns and been true to your own beliefs. Now it may be best to just move on. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:31, June 16, 2008
This is an encyclopedia entry? "I would like to thank classical Greek civilization for the invention of man-boy love affairs." This is a conservative entry?
I suggest that this whole entry be moved to "talk" and the "Greek empire" page be left empty if there is no qualified material for it.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Anitra (talk)
I am going to clear out all this nonsense pretty soon, and make it into something resembling an article. I notice Joaquin has edited it a lot, and he has said stuff to me twice already about not removing items before saying something, so here I am: I am going to remove at least half of the junk in it, and rewrite it almost entirely.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 22:58, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- Please improve the article. HenryS 23:07, 4 June 2008 (EDT)
- Okay, this has probably been up long enough now.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 01:15, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
- Thanks. Good work. HenryS 01:31, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
As should be obvious to anyone now, Joaquin has decided he doesn't want to discuss his edits, he just wants to keep making them over and over. Seven, eight times now. I have brought this to his attention almost as many times on his user talk, but he ignores me.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 14:01, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
- Tom you may want to just let it go. It would appear that Joaquin believes you are nitpicking and that any "debate" on it is a waste of his time. He would rather create. Perhaps he feels the blockquote indentation simply gives it a better layout. Is it that important? You've expressed your concerns and been true to your own beliefs. Now it may be best to just move on. Learn together 14:29, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
Joaquin, it would probably be best to explain the reversions, because some clean up could be useful. DanH 14:31, 16 June 2008 (EDT)