Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Conservative Style"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(starting actual discussion) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Conservative Style]] is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | [[Conservative Style]] is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
*'''Delete''' [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | *'''Delete''' [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I agree with all of the above, but how could it be fairly deleted while [[Liberal style]], with all the same flaws, remains?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 13:42, 18 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:42, June 18, 2008
Conservative Style is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. HenryS 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
- Delete HenryS 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
I agree with all of the above, but how could it be fairly deleted while Liberal style, with all the same flaws, remains?--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 13:42, 18 June 2008 (EDT)