Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Conservative Style"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
just as fair as all the Liberal [word] articles '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 21:02, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
+
[[Conservative Style]] is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
−
:Ummm... but no content, generalizations, etc. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:03, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
+
*'''Delete''' [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
I agree with all of the above, but how could it be fairly deleted while [[Liberal style]], with all the same flaws, remains?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 13:42, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::Go set up an AfD for [[Liberal Style]].  See who supports. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 14:19, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:19, June 18, 2008

Conservative Style is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. HenryS 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

  • Delete HenryS 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)

I agree with all of the above, but how could it be fairly deleted while Liberal style, with all the same flaws, remains?--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 13:42, 18 June 2008 (EDT)

Go set up an AfD for Liberal Style. See who supports. HenryS 14:19, 18 June 2008 (EDT)