Difference between revisions of "File talk:Approx level of technology in Noah's time.png"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Fix link formatting; reply.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | Having read the [http://www.worldwideflood.com/ark/technology/ancient_technology.htm link] on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
: I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | : I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "[[dark ages]]", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-[[User:AShephard|AShephard]] 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:28, June 21, 2008
Having read the link on this subject, and being somewhat of an historian myself, I have to take issue with this graph for a number of different reasons. Before I do, do you defend all the Y-values on the graph? As in, Egypt=Noah=Rome=Greece=Renaissance? If so, that's where we'll start :-).AShephard 10:17, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I wouldn't defend it entirely. For one thing, it shows a very low figure for the supposed "dark ages", when technology actually advanced. For another, we really have next to no idea what level of technology was achieved pre-flood. Philip J. Rayment 10:27, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Right. Okay, that's good. I wonder if the poster, Ymmotrojam, agrees!-AShephard 10:28, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
