Difference between revisions of "Diagonalization"
m (links, typos) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into 1-1 correspondence to the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set. | + | '''Diagonalization''' is a technique first used by [[Cantor|Georg Cantor]], a [[Germany|German]] [[mathematician]]. He used it to show that the [[real number]]s can not be put into 1-1 correspondence to the [[natural number]]s, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not [[countable]]. This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set. |
==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers== | ==Proof of the non-countability of real numbers== | ||
| − | There exists a map <math>f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow[0,1]</math> (in fact all infinitly supported probability distribution does this). | + | There exists a map <math>f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow[0,1]</math> (in fact all infinitly supported [[probability distribution]] does this). Therefore there are as many number in <math>[0,1]</math> as <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. |
| − | We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are uncountable. | + | We will now use [[proof by contradiction]] to show that the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are [[uncountable]]. |
Assume the numbers in [0,1], are countable. Then we can list them as such, | Assume the numbers in [0,1], are countable. Then we can list them as such, | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>. | <math>a_{i}=1</math> when <math>a_{ii}\neq1</math> and <math>a_{i}=2</math> when <math>a_{ii}=1</math>. | ||
| − | Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a | + | Therefore <math>a</math> is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in <math>[0,1]</math> are not countable. Therefore <math>\mathbb{R}</math> is uncountable.<ref>Komolgorov, ''Introduction to Real Analysis''. (Available in most book stores).</ref> |
==Diagonalization and the Existence of God== | ==Diagonalization and the Existence of God== | ||
Revision as of 23:51, June 21, 2008
Diagonalization is a technique first used by Georg Cantor, a German mathematician. He used it to show that the real numbers can not be put into 1-1 correspondence to the natural numbers, thereby demonstrating the real numbers are not countable. This method can be applied to any infinite set to construct an even larger infinite set.
Proof of the non-countability of real numbers
There exists a map (in fact all infinitly supported probability distribution does this). Therefore there are as many number in as .
We will now use proof by contradiction to show that the numbers in are uncountable.
Assume the numbers in [0,1], are countable. Then we can list them as such,
Where
Construct the number,
, where
when and when .
Therefore is not in the list, so we have a contradiction and our assumption is false, the numbers in are not countable. Therefore is uncountable.[1]
Diagonalization and the Existence of God
Some have cited diagonalization as a formal challenge to Saint Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God. In summary, Anselm argued that there must be a greatest idea and what could be greater than God? Therefore God exists.[2]
However, diagonalization argues that no greatest idea can exist: quite bluntly, God is infinite, therefore He can be diagonalized to produce an even greater infinite.[3] This seeming disproof of the existence of God has cast doubt on the validity of Cantor's diagonalization.
References
- ↑ Komolgorov, Introduction to Real Analysis. (Available in most book stores).
- ↑ http://www.ephilosopher.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?104130
- ↑ Topo-philosophies: Plato's Diagonals, Hegel's Spirals, and Irigaray's Multifolds, Arkady Plotnitsky. In After Poststructuralism: Writing the Intellectual History of Theory Tilottama Rajan, Michael James.