Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parturition"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(R)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
::Tsk. You know what I mean. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::Tsk. You know what I mean. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. [[User:NormanS|NormanS]] 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 11:54, June 24, 2008

Is such graphic information family friendly? Bugler 07:07, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

What is graphic about it? NormanS 07:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Tsk. You know what I mean. Bugler 07:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
No I don't. I have made sure I have not mentioned reproductive organs or the act that leads to pregnancy, instead I have focused on the physiological processes involved. If you have any specific examples of text which is not family friendly please post it here. NormanS 07:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
What a touchy fellow you are! I wasn't criticising any specific part of your article, which I'm sure is accurate to a degree, but merely raising a discussion point as to the appropriateness and propriety of the level of detail. Bugler 07:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)