Difference between revisions of "User talk:Daphnea"
(→Answer to your question.: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Stop making positive edits, part of the lulz from this place comes from their HI-larious "definitions". Make more troll edits, but don't give advice on how to correct page. Jesus, dude.--[[User:Ivysaur|Ivysaur]] 22:41, 23 June 2008 (EDT) | Stop making positive edits, part of the lulz from this place comes from their HI-larious "definitions". Make more troll edits, but don't give advice on how to correct page. Jesus, dude.--[[User:Ivysaur|Ivysaur]] 22:41, 23 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Answer to your question. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Bugler did not seem to want to answer, so here is the best answer I can come up with. I would suggest steering clear of any pages that start with the word "liberal," or contain the word "values." Those pages are watched pretty closely, and any dissenting information is pretty quickly reverted. Other than that there is no easy way to tell what pages are dangerous ground. [[Barack Obama]] is another. If you look at the talk page and see alot of arguing and debate, that might be an indicator. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim]] <small>(CPAdmin1)</small><sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> <sup>[[User:CPAdmin1/Polls|Vote in my NEW polls]]</sup> 11:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:48, June 24, 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Daphnea, and welcome to Conservapedia!
We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.
At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!
Thanks for reading, Daphnea!
Richard Dawkins
It appears I made a mistake. Please accept my apologies. Geoff PlourdeComplain! 20:02, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Thank you. No problem. Daphnea 20:04, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Stop making positive edits, part of the lulz from this place comes from their HI-larious "definitions". Make more troll edits, but don't give advice on how to correct page. Jesus, dude.--Ivysaur 22:41, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Answer to your question.
Bugler did not seem to want to answer, so here is the best answer I can come up with. I would suggest steering clear of any pages that start with the word "liberal," or contain the word "values." Those pages are watched pretty closely, and any dissenting information is pretty quickly reverted. Other than that there is no easy way to tell what pages are dangerous ground. Barack Obama is another. If you look at the talk page and see alot of arguing and debate, that might be an indicator. --Tim (CPAdmin1)talk Vote in my NEW polls 11:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)