Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
103 bytes added ,  16:54, March 19, 2007
restored info
Line 23: Line 23:  
== Criticism of the Giant-Impact Model ==
 
== Criticism of the Giant-Impact Model ==
   −
Scientists did find that there is currently no evidence for or against three important predictions of the Giant Impact model."<ref>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf</ref>
+
This new theory fail lacks testability and falsifiability, which are essential aspects of science as explained by [[Karl Popper]]. 
 +
 
 +
Scientists did find that none of three proposed tests are "supportive of the Giant Impact model."<ref>http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/origin98/pdf/4045.pdf</ref>
    
Another article noted that the Moon is lacking in siderophilic elements (Au, Co, Fe, Ir, Mn, Mo, Ni, Os, Pd, Pt, Re, Rh, Ru) found on Earth, and this indicates that the Moon was not formed by materials broken off of Earth.<ref>http://www.ias.ac.in/jessci/dec2005/ilc-3.pdf</ref>
 
Another article noted that the Moon is lacking in siderophilic elements (Au, Co, Fe, Ir, Mn, Mo, Ni, Os, Pd, Pt, Re, Rh, Ru) found on Earth, and this indicates that the Moon was not formed by materials broken off of Earth.<ref>http://www.ias.ac.in/jessci/dec2005/ilc-3.pdf</ref>
Line 38: Line 40:  
''Scientific American'' concluded:<ref>''Id.''</ref>
 
''Scientific American'' concluded:<ref>''Id.''</ref>
   −
:"Considering all the twists and turns in lunar science, nobody claims that the models are complete just yet."
+
:Considering all the twists and turns in lunar science, nobody claims that the models are complete just yet.
    
== Reference ==
 
== Reference ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,219

edits

Navigation menu