Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them"
(New page: == Sourced Material? == LT, the things you put back into the article are not sourced. The entirety of the "sourcing" is a single webpage with absolutely no sourcing. Instead, the only l...) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Unless more "sources" can be brought forward, I plan on stripping this article down to the absolute basics--title of book, author, and publishing date. Let's stick to the truth and not, according to CP Commandment #5, "personal opinion on an encyclopedic entry." Oh, and the other site used as a "source" would fall under this caveat of the CP Commandments, "Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others." --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 13:55, 27 June 2008 (EDT) | Unless more "sources" can be brought forward, I plan on stripping this article down to the absolute basics--title of book, author, and publishing date. Let's stick to the truth and not, according to CP Commandment #5, "personal opinion on an encyclopedic entry." Oh, and the other site used as a "source" would fall under this caveat of the CP Commandments, "Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others." --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 13:55, 27 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :You;ve got to be kidding me.... I spent a pretty good chunk of time working on this and you just revert without discussion... must be nice to be a sysop around here '''[[user:JDavidson|<font color="#000085" >JDavidson</font>]]'''[[User_talk:JDavidson|<font color="#660099"><sup>'''Leave a message ::BEEP::'''</sup></font>]] 14:33, 27 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:33, June 27, 2008
Sourced Material?
LT, the things you put back into the article are not sourced. The entirety of the "sourcing" is a single webpage with absolutely no sourcing. Instead, the only link THAT "source" provides is a link to a non-existent webpage. So while Franken's quote is sourced, any judgment on the truthfulness of that quote is unsourced.
Unless more "sources" can be brought forward, I plan on stripping this article down to the absolute basics--title of book, author, and publishing date. Let's stick to the truth and not, according to CP Commandment #5, "personal opinion on an encyclopedic entry." Oh, and the other site used as a "source" would fall under this caveat of the CP Commandments, "Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others." --Jareddr 13:55, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
- You;ve got to be kidding me.... I spent a pretty good chunk of time working on this and you just revert without discussion... must be nice to be a sysop around here JDavidsonLeave a message ::BEEP:: 14:33, 27 June 2008 (EDT)